Jesus as Yahweh and the Word (Logos)

TL;DR:
Was Jesus truly God? In contrast to what Jehovah's Witnesses teach, the Bible declares that Jesus has God’s eternal attributes, performs divine actions, and claims divine authority. Passages such as John 1:1 and Jesus’ “I am” statements reveal Jesus’ identity as Yahweh incarnate. The New Testament consistently portrays Jesus as the eternal Creator God who became human.

3. Discussing Jesus’ identity with a Jehovah's Witness

“As was his custom, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures.” — Acts 17:2 (2011 NIV)

Excerpts from an email exchange with a Jehovah's Witness

Watchtower Society interchange: Recently, a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses and I exchanged a lot of e-mail messages about beliefs and doctrines. Here are the questions he asked and the responses I gave. In reality, this is a blog of our conversations. There will be some overlapping of material since the email conversation occasionally circled back to the same themes.

One of the sad things about our email exchanges is that my Jehovah's Witness friend rarely commented on my responses or asked me follow-up questions. So we had very few real "conversations" discussing anything in-depth.

Jehovah's Witness question: Where in Scripture does it say that Jesus is the same as Jehovah?
My answer: Well, take a look at what Jesus said about Himself. Take a look at what was said about Him in Scripture. Here are some Bible passages that indicate Jesus was Yahweh incarnate:

What about Jesus’ repeated use of “I am”—“I am the good shepherd”; “I am the gate”; “I am the way and the truth and the life”; “I am the true vine”; “I am the resurrection and the life”; and “I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star”? Would those statements have reminded Jewish listeners of God’s “I AM” declaration to Moses in the wilderness?

Some Jewish leaders sought Jesus’ death because they understood His claims as making Himself equal with God, which they regarded as blasphemy.

His disciples likewise referred to Jesus as Kyrios, the Greek word for “Lord” that the Septuagint frequently uses to represent the divine name Yahweh. Applying this title to Jesus makes a strong statement about His divinity.

In John 20:18 Mary Magdalene is quoted as saying, “I have seen the Lord.” The Greek word used in the passage is kyrios, a word that clearly refers to God in Acts 7:31: “I heard the Lord say to me.”

Kyrios is also the same word used for God in such passages as Philippians 4:5, 2 Corinthians 8:21, 1 Thessalonians 3:3, 2 Timothy 2:24, Hebrews 13:6, 1 Peter 1:25, 1 Peter 2:3, 2 Peter 3:9, James 1:7, James 4:10, and Revelation 4:11.

When Paul repeatedly refers to Jesus as Lord—the title represented in Exodus 3:15, which you quoted—it is clear that he understood Jesus to be God. For Paul, there is only “one Lord.”

In the 21st century, we can try to rationalize away the early Christians’ conviction that Jesus of Nazareth was God incarnate. However, Jesus’ followers used the title “Lord” for Him in the same way that they used “Lord” for God. In his writings, John clearly affirms the deity of Christ. Read the Gospel of John and his three letters all the way through in one sitting. Reading them as complete works rather than focusing on isolated phrases of Scripture will help you see that John was intent on demonstrating that Jesus was indeed God.

Jehovah's Witness question: How could the Word be with God and be God at the same time? When you find a sensible answer to this question, let me know.
My answer: You've asked an excellent question. John 1:1 is one of the most finely crafted verses in the entire Bible. Try to put aside your theological lens for a moment and just look at how the verse is worded. See how its three phrases build to a climax. The first phrase of the verse proclaims the eternal preexistence of the Word ("In the beginning was the Word"). The next phrase defines the relationship of the Word to God. Then the last phrase establishes that the essential nature of the Word is Deity ("The Word was God"). Verse two then comes back to state again the eternality of the Word—such eternal preexistence is, of course, a quality unique to God.

Some Greek and Jewish thinkers used logos for divine reason or for the rational principle underlying the universe. Philo, a well-known Jewish philosopher who lived about 20 BC to AD 50, used the term in discussing God’s activity and relationship to the world. It is no accident that John used logos, translated “the Word.” John identifies the Word with the Creator Yahweh.

The potency of this Scripture verse does not come from the phrases with God and was God. This verse's power centers on John's use of “Word.” To the ancient Greeks, logos (what we translate as "word") was not just speech or reason. Logos or "Word" was at the center of the Greek understanding of the existence of the universe. The logos could not be dated in time. The logos was associated with creative and ordering power. John 1 should remind us of Genesis 1, which portrays God speaking the universe into existence (“And God said, ‘Let there be . . .’”). John draws on this idea to demonstrate the eternal preexistence of Jesus and to show that He was, in fact, the eternal Creator God.

Your question actually centers on the second phrase of that verse: "the Word was with God." Let's look at that phrase. The Greek preposition pros has some shades of meaning that may not be fully communicated by our English word "with." What John was trying to say with his phrase "with God" is much more than merely "being near" or "beside."

In this context, pros conveys a personal relationship and distinction between the Word and God, not merely physical nearness. John wrote that the divine Word existed with the Father from all eternity.

John 1:1–14 declares three important truths about “the Word”:
  1. The One who existed in the beginning entered human history.
  2. He who was eternally joined to the Father came and lived among human beings.
  3. He who was God became flesh.
All three of these thoughts are introduced in verse one and are then developed in verse 14. As I have said, the wording of John 1:1 is finely crafted.

Share this page:

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp

— Howard Culbertson, hculbert@snu.edu

You might also like these